|
Introduction
to the Islamic Term "Jihad"
"Jihad" is a term very much alive in the Islamic world and
certainly a familiar concept among educated Westerners, although non-Muslims
tend to think of jihad as the media-popularized version of "holy
war." Its root word, "jahada," is defined as
"exerting one's utmost power, efforts, endeavors, or ability
in contending with an object of disapprobation" (Firestone 16).
Jihad is expected to be implemented within many different aspects
of life on many different levels and the majority of its uses are
geared toward personal betterment.
Jihad has two fundamental meanings: the first, the greater jihad,
is an inner struggle against one's evil tendencies; the second,
the lesser jihad, is to convert unbelievers or to work towards the
moral betterment of Islamic society (Peters 369).
It is a common misconception for non-Muslims to think of only the
lesser jihad (the jihad encompassing "holy war") without
giving credit to the emphasis Muslims give to the greater jihad,
or the internal struggle (the more peaceful form of the word). But,
as can be deduced by the parts of jihad listed below, many of the
facets are those that do not promote or encompass war or violence.
|
|
Types of Jihad
Jihad against one's self (Al-Munajjid). It
is of first importance for a Muslim to make every effort to learn
the teachings of Islam. It is often a great struggle to put Allah
ahead of all things and to truly embrace these teachings. But, without
this learning, a Muslim cannot expect to find happiness in this
world or in the hereafter. Once a Muslim has learned the teachings,
he or she must act according to the teachings. It is not enough
simply to learn them. One must practice the teachings in one's
daily life.
Next, a Muslim must call others to Islam and be courageous in the
transfer of Islamic teachings. He or she must bear difficulties
and insults with patience--sometimes a formidable task in the face
of hostility towards Islam.
Jihad against the shaytan, or evilness. Every
Muslim is expected to defend against the doubts something or someone
evil may employ to undermine the faith. Muslims must also
ward off the corruption that the shaytan provokes (Al-Munajjid).
Jihad of oppression. Muslims can participate
in physical jihad when confronted with oppressive situations. If
a Muslim cannot fight, he or she is expected to speak out against
the oppression. If he or she cannot speak out, then the oppression
must be fought by hatred and the knowledge that it is wrong (Muhammad
Salih Al-Munajjid). This is illustrated in the following quoteation
from the Qur'an:
And what is the matter with you that you do not fight in the
cause of Allah and for those weak,
ill treated and oppressed among men, women and children whose
only cry is; 'Our Lord, rescue
us from this town whose people are oppressors and raise for
us from you one who will protect
and raise for us from you one who will help. (Surah An-Nisa
4:75) (qtd. in "Islam-A Religion of Terror?")
|
|
History of Jihad
The concept of jihad is influenced by the ideas regarding war, which
began among pre-Islamic northern Arab tribes. It goes back to the
wars fought by the Prophet Muhammad and holds a distinctive place
in the Qur'an and the hadith. The Qur'an mentions jihad in reference
to fighting against unbelievers and encourages believers to participate
in sanctioned wars, promises rewards to those killed, and threatens
those who refuse to participate. Other parts of the Qur'an deal
with more practical matters concerning war including exemption from
military service, prisoners of war, and truce (Peters 370).
The hadith clearly states that a war against unbelievers cannot
begin without first summoning them to Islam or submission. The unbelievers
must first be asked to convert. If they decline, they are to be
asked to pay a poll-tax. If they refuse this, believers are allowed
to fight them. It should be noted, however, that the Qur'an limits
this option to the People of the Book (Christians and Jews) although
in practice it was extended to other religions (such as the Zorastrians)
(Peters 371).
|
|
Historical Functions of Jihad
Jihad has three main historical functions. First, it serves as motivation
for Muslims to participate in wars against unbelievers--something
regarded as a religious duty. Those killed in battle are promised
to become martyrs and will go directly to Paradise.
Its second function is to enhance the strength of a ruler. One
of the main tasks of a lawful caliph is to wage jihad against unbelievers.
Doing so more firmly establishes his leadership position (Peters
371).
The third function of jihad is to provide a set of rules regarding
relationships between unbelievers (the enemies) and believers and
create a war "code of conduct" (Peters 371)--two things
that, in the Prophet Muhammad's time, were very relevant and necessary.
|
|
Changing Interpretations
As with most concepts, jihad is ever-changing in its interpretations.
This is, perhaps, one of the main reasons Westerners tend to have
a distorted view of jihad. Although most aspects of jihad can be
agreed upon by Muslims, it is expected that its parts will be questioned
at some point.
An example of this is with two major Muslim sects, the Sunnis and
the Shi'ites. Although they view jihad in very similar ways, there
is one very important difference. The Twelver Shi'ites
believe that jihad can only be waged under the leadership of a rightful
imam. There has not been one since 873 CE. Thus, according to the
Shi'ites, present-day expansionist jihad should not be waged.
This, of course, is only in reference to expansionist jihad--defensive
jihad is fought without question (Peters 371).
Another interpretation arose when Indian Muslim thinker Sayyid
Ahmad Khan (1817-1898) expressed his belief that jihad
should only be waged in the case of oppression or obstruction of
faith. He used this interpretation to allay the fears of the
British, who, at the time, accused the Muslims of wishing to restore
Moghul rule and, under jihad, were plotting to fight the British.
This belief was causing young Muslims to lose their government jobs.
Khan's redefinition of jihad helped to prove to the British that
it would go against jihad for Muslims to fight them, as the British
were not being oppressive or obstructing their faith.
Contemporary thinkers offer an even wider array of views. Conservatives
tend toward the classical view of jihad while radicals encourage
the spread of Islam (at times through violence). Those who fall
between conservatives and radicals each have their own varied interpretations,
one of which is discussed below.
|
|
Jihad Today
In addition to the conservatives and radicals, since the events
of 9/11, many contemporary Muslims are attempting to revisit what
Westerners term "jihad." The fact that the term tends
to be negatively connotated (in the Western world, at least) cannot
go unnoticed by Muslims around the world. Jihad means, Muslims stress,
"that Muslims should fulfill their duties to promote the cause
of Islam. It is not only an outward act, but also an inward one
to strengthen one's own self and correct one's own mistakes"
(Mostafa).
Most importantly, jihad is first and foremost a inner struggle
for betterment and one should not jump to the conclusion that it
is solely a means to wage war. Of course, it also does not promise
all conflicts will end peacefully or that war will not be waged
in certain circumstances. Throughout history, and to the present
day, jihad has been exercised in a variety of ways--including war.
Many modern-day Muslims are having difficulty coming to terms with
the media-driven definition of jihad. Shaista Aziz, a Muslim
professional raised in Great Britain, decided to pack her bags and
leave her comfortable lifestyle in order to help the oppression
experienced by the Palestinians. She worked in refugee camps,
accompanied paramedics, and helped with the setup of income-generating
plans. All of these efforts were in response to her strong will
to participate in jihad. This, of course, cannot be considered
violent jihad. Her jihad was in effort to help other people (Aziz
22).
|
|
Coming to Terms with Jihad as a Non-Muslim
It is easy to get caught up in the propaganda that defines jihad
as a violent "holy war." But a look at the Qur'an proves
that Muslims do not promote random acts of violence:
...If anyone killed a person not in retaliation for murder
or to spread mischief in the land, it would be as
if he killed the whole of mankind. And (likewise) if anyone
saved a life, it would be as if he saved the whole
of mankind. (Surah Al-Maaida 5:32 ) (qtd. in "Islam-A
Religion of Terror?")
Indeed, killing of other human beings is strongly discouraged,
if not abhorred. Human life is highly esteemed in Islam and the
concept of jihad does not seek to breach this sacredness. Jihad
is about one's inner struggle to become a better Muslim and one's
responsibility to uphold one's faith and it is important to Muslims
around the world that this be understood.
|
Works Cited
Al-Munajjid, Sheikh Muhammad Salih. "Jihad." Accessed 28 September
2004. <http://www.islam-qa.com>.
Aziz, Shaista. "On the Street." New Internationalist.
Issue 370 (August 2004): 22.
Rudolph Peters. "Jihad." The Oxford
Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World. Volume 2. Ed. John
Esposito. New York: Oxford University Press. 2001. 369-373.
Firestone, Reuven. Jihad: The Origin of Holy War in Islam.
New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Mostafa, Nadia Mahmoud. "How to Comprehend Jihad." Islam
Information Page. Accessed 25 September 2004. <http://www.islamic-knowledge.com/>
"Islam-A Religion of Terror?" Accessed 28 September 2004. <http://www.thetruereligion.org>.
|